Saturday 27 February 2016

[DiversityGreen] Sustainable Development Update - 25 February 2016 - IISD Reporting Services

 

 

Having trouble viewing this email? Please try our Browser Version.


Sustainable Development Policy & Practice is a knowledgebase tracking intergovernmental activities to implement the sustainable development agenda. It was launched in December 2010 by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Reporting Services, which manages and is fully responsible for the content posted on Sustainable Development Policy & Practice . Information on United Nations activities is provided in cooperation with the UN system agencies, funds and programmes through the United Nations System Chief Executives Board for Coordination (UN CEB) Secretariat. Click here for further information on Sustainable Development Policy & Practice


 

__._,_.___

Posted by: "Conserve Africa" <info.ca@conserveafrica.org.uk>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

[DiversityGreen] FW: CFS Bulletin - Vol. 184 No. 11 – 2nd Meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals of the Committee on World Food Security - Briefing Note [1 Attachment]

 
[Attachment(s) from Conserve Africa included below]

 

 

Having trouble viewing this email? Please try our Browser Version

 

IISD Reporting Services

IISD Reporting Services on Facebook IISD Reporting Services on Twitter  Join our Report Distribution mailing list

CFS Bulletin

Volume 184 Number 11 | 27 February 2016


Second Meeting of the OEWG on SDGS of the CFS

24 February 2016 | Rome, Italy


Languages: EN (HTML/PDF)

Visit our IISD/ENB+ Meeting Coverage from Rome, Italy at:
http://www.iisd.ca/food-security/cfs/owg/sdgs/


The second meeting of the Open Ended Working Group (OEWG) on Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) was held on 24 February 2016, at the headquarters of the World Food Programme (WFP), in Rome, Italy. Member countries and multi-stakeholder participants heard a presentation on the UN Secretary-General's report on critical milestones towards coherent, efficient and inclusive follow-up and review at global level (UN Doc A/70/684); discussed an outline of a proposal on CFS engagement to advance the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2030 Agenda); and addressed a preliminary mapping of CFS products for the 2030 Agenda and next steps.

The OEWG on SDGs was established by CFS at its 42nd Plenary session. The objective of this informal working group, which is open to all CFS Stakeholders, is to agree on a proposal on how CFS as a global, multi-stakeholder committee, will support progress reaching the SDGs related to sustainable agriculture, food security and nutrition, and in advancing the parts of the 2030 Agenda which fall within its mandate. Discussions focused on CFS' role to provide a platform for identifying and sharing achievements and challenges related to SDG implementation; address policy gaps that may impede SDG implementation; and identify opportunities for accelerating progress on particular themes. A proposal will be submitted to the CFS 43rd Plenary session (October 2016).

At its first meeting, the OEWG heard presentations on the 2030 Agenda; addressed the OEWG workplan for the year, including its objectives, expected outcomes and activities; and started discussion on possible CFS work in support of implementation of the 2030 Agenda and achievement of the SDGs.

This report summarizes the proceedings of the second meeting of the OEWG.

REPORT OF THE MEETING

Jim Harvey, WFP Chief of Staff, welcomed participants and highlighted support to CFS as an example of successful collaboration between the Rome-based agencies. Noting that the UN Secretary-General identified CFS as a prime example of a multi-stakeholder platform, he drew attention to CFS' critical role in advancing implementation of the 2030 Agenda and nutrition-related issues.

OEWG Chair Willem Olthof, Senior Development Adviser, EU Delegation, provided an overview of the meeting's agenda and background documents.

UN SECRETARY-GENERAL'S REPORT ON CRITICAL MILESTONES TOWARDS FOLLOW-UP AND REVIEW

Gabriel Ferrero, Senior Policy Advisor to the UN Secretary-General's Special Representative for Food Security and Nutrition and Special Adviser on the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development David Nabarro, presented on the Secretary-General's report on critical milestones towards coherent, efficient and inclusive follow-up and review at global level.

Ferrero said the report contains the Secretary-General's analysis and proposals, including on the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) operations, institutional responsibilities, contribution of all intergovernmental platforms to the 2030 Agenda, and arrangements for State-led reviews, and will be addressed in intergovernmental negotiations under the UN General Assembly (GA). He said the review system should be country-led, people-centered, gender-sensitive, participatory, and useful to countries and people; and underscored the need for inclusiveness, support to national implementation, and coherency with existing institutions. He provided an overview of the HLPF operations under the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and UNGA; and noted that thematic reviews of progress will be aligned with ECOSOC sessions and supported by ECOSOC functional commissions and other intergovernmental bodies, such as CFS.

Ferrero outlined core inputs to HLPF sessions, including voluntary national reviews and inputs by intergovernmental thematic forums, and clarified that intergovernmental forums, such as CFS, are under no reporting obligation but have the flexibility to decide their own approach and contribution to the HLPF. He said the report proposes three steps to enable such forums to support the HLPF: reflection on the implications of the 2030 Agenda; examination of their working methods; and reflection on their ability to engage critical actors. He presented options for defining the HLPF annual theme and the sequence of thematic reviews, including an illustrative example of a possible four-year cycle.

In the ensuing discussion, participants discussed the illustrative example on the sequence of the reviews, noting that it proposes that the HLPF addresses food security in 2017. Some said that an additional year would allow for more advanced contribution by CFS. Others suggested that CFS is considered ready to contribute with regards to its already endorsed policy products. Ferrero noted that the sequence of reviews can change, and further explained that CFS is recognized as ready to undertake inclusive reviews. He urged Member States to send a message to New York processes that CFS can offer a sound, inclusive process if given time to function. Participants also addressed the multiple reporting duties of specialized agencies, both to their governing bodies and the HLPF.

CFS ENGAGEMENT TO ADVANCE THE 2030 AGENDA

Chair Olthof introduced an annotated outline of a zero-draft proposal on CFS engagement in advancing the 2030 Agenda (CFS OEWG-SDGs/2016/02/24/04), which includes an introduction containing the background to SDGs and CFS, and sections on: points of departure, covering what CFS should and should not do; means of engagement, including support to countries in implementation, contributing to the global thematic review, and CFS agenda setting; and implications for the organization of CFS work. Participants commended the approach and structure of the outline as an excellent starting point, and made both general and specific comments.

Afghanistan, with Brazil, called for a section on expected outcomes, including a mapping of CFS initiatives in support of SDG 2 (ending hunger, achieving food security and improved nutrition and promoting sustainable agriculture) and other related SDGs; monitoring the result of CFS inputs in the implementation of SDGs of relevance to food security and nutrition; and reporting the results of CFS contribution to the SDGs to CFS Plenary and other relevant forums. Italy noted that monitoring implementation of CFS policy products would contribute to monitoring food security and nutrition as a whole. Argentina stressed the national ownership of the monitoring and review process at country level.

Participants briefly addressed whether to refer to "principles" rather than "points of departure." The Private Sector Mechanism (PSM) called for reference to the "five Ps" of sustainable development (people, planet, peace, partnership, prosperity). The International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), with FAO, suggested focus on partnerships, noting that CFS products do not target only governments. Many stressed that CFS reaches those affected by hunger and malnutrition and smallholder farmers. The World Health Organization (WHO) welcomed the focus on food security and nutrition and stressed interlinkages between all targets of SDG 2. The Gates Foundation and WFP called for demonstrating the linkages between SDG 2 and other SDGs.

Ferrero identified CFS contribution to advance both food security and nutrition, and the 2030 Agenda review process as a whole. IFAD suggested that CFS focus on SDG 2 in the thematic review process to bring in specialized knowledge, while its contribution to implementation would cover interlinkages among all SDGs.

Afghanistan, Switzerland and France requested referencing sustainable agriculture. Norway, IFAD, France, Brazil and the Civil Society Mechanism (CSM) suggested reaffirming the centrality of the human rights framework, particularly the right to food, and the EU Delegation added gender equality, climate change and governance.

On means of engagement, the PSM stressed that CFS should provide input to the HLPF to the maximum extent possible. Switzerland suggested exploring the relationship between CFS and HLPF. IFAD and France highlighted CFS' role in promoting multi-stakeholder dialogue. Italy, Brazil and the CSM proposed stressing the effects of policy convergence and coordination. The CSM suggested the Global Strategic Framework is an important contribution to the global thematic review. Pakistan noted the need to go beyond dissemination of CFS products, possibly incorporating them in country-level projects.

On implications for CFS work, many agreed on the need to increase visibility and presence in New York and to draw attention to CFS as a reference for a multi-stakeholder forum. Ferrero noted the process is global and multi-level, not happening only in New York. Regarding collaboration with other organizations, Germany and France suggested specific reference to organizations of relevance, such as WHO, FAO and the International Labour Organization. Many questioned the need to reassess existing CFS products, calling for aligning future products with the SDGs instead. The Netherlands suggested exploring the contribution which reports of the CFS High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) could make, to support the identification of policy gaps and challenges, and emerging issues. Afghanistan, with IFAD and France, called for clarifying the proposed gap/challenge analysis of SDG implementation, and for taking into consideration available resources, and Chair Olthof agreed on the need to examine the feasibility of proposed actions. The Secretariat stressed the need to examine the feasibility of commissioning reports on gap/challenge analysis of SDG implementation to the HLPE, whose role is to provide state of the art science reports on specific topics related to food security and nutrition.

Chair Olthof said the Secretariat, assisted by the technical task team, will draft a full proposal, to be considered at the third meeting of the OEWG, scheduled for 3 May 2016. Italy noted the OEWG meeting clashes with the CFS multi-stakeholder dialogue, to be held in conjunction with the FAO Regional Conference for Europe, in Antalya, Turkey, and requested revising the schedule.

CFS PRODUCTS FOR THE 2030 AGENDA: PRELIMINARY MAPPING

The Secretariat requested participants' views on a mapping of SDG targets in relation to CFS scope and policy products (Information Note CFS OEWG-SDGs/2016/02/24/05). Participants noted the document is useful. France said it is a technical document and should not be negotiated. Pakistan and Italy suggested focus on targets identified as falling widely in the scope of CFS. Italy, Brazil and the EU Delegation suggested that target 12.3 on food loss and waste falls in the scope of CFS. The CSM stressed the role of the Global Strategic Framework for the achievement of many SDGs.

Chair Olthof agreed the document is a technical one, and encouraged the Secretariat to refine it for further discussion.

NEXT STEPS

The Secretariat said possibilities will be explored for an intersessional event before the third meeting of the OEWG, to address technical matters. Chair Olthof thanked participants for their inputs and closed the meeting at 5:40 pm.




View enb Forum
           Membership Options / Unsubscribe


Subscribe to all other IISD Reporting Services' free newsletters and lists for environment and sustainable development policy professionals at http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm


 

__._,_.___

Attachment(s) from Conserve Africa | View attachments on the web

1 of 1 File(s)


Posted by: "Conserve Africa" <info.ca@conserveafrica.org.uk>
Reply via web post Reply to sender Reply to group Start a new topic Messages in this topic (1)

.

__,_._,___

Thursday 25 February 2016

[ConserveAfrica] Fwd: Sustainable Development Practice in Africa


Please find attached an information resources about sustainable development practice in Africa.

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-You received this message because you are subscribed to "Green Convert)" group.
-For more information, please visit: http://www.conserveafrica.org.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Conserve Africa Network" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to conserveafricanetwork+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to conserveafricanetwork@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/conserveafricanetwork.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/conserveafricanetwork/CAFWpkgRUr0anS1Y-zA1hPRwwc0VV2B2GgSca7gAM7TMj_f8jXw%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Wednesday 24 February 2016

FW: Asia Pacific Forestry Week: Legality, Sustainability & Smallholders

 

We'd like to invite all attending the Asia Pacific Forestry Week to come and discuss collaboration opportunities with PEFC International and our members and stakeholders from throughout the Asia-Pacific region. Please join us for the following two side events:

 

Emerging governance mechanisms in ASEAN: supporting improved quality infrastructure for forest sector legality and sustainability initiatives
Gathering relevant stakeholders across Asia-Pacific to develop a regional program for improving auditing, certification, accreditation, standards and scheme development
Holiday Inn, 9am-1pm
Wednesday 24 February 2016

 

Positive impacts from private sector investment in communities and smallholders: the forest production systems of the future
Showcasing four successful models from Southeast Asia: direct cooperation in Laos, supporting out growers in Thailand, community engagement in Indonesia and providing good market conditions in Vietnam
Holiday Inn, 9am-Midday
Friday 26 February 2016

 

For more information about the events, please contact Richard Laity at richard.laity@pefc.org.

 

PEFC is an independent, not-for-profit organization promoting sustainable forest management by certifying forests and the products that come from them. PEFC is the world's largest forest certification system and the certification system of choice for small- and family forest owners. More information: http://www.pefc.org/

 

 

Thorsten Arndt
Head of Communications
 




PEFC International
World Trade Centre 1
10 route de L'Aéroport
CH-1215 Genève
Switzerland
www.pefc.org
t.arndt@pefc.org

Skype: thorsten_pefc
Tel: +41 (0)22 799 45 40
Fax: +41 (0)22 799 45 50
 
POSTAL ADDRESS:

PEFC Council
Case Postale 636
CH-1215 Genève 15
Switzerland

 

Please don't be alarmed or feel guilty: it's ok to print this e-mail on PEFC-certified paper. Paper is a biodegradable, compostable, renewable, sustainable product made from trees. Growing and harvesting trees provides jobs for millions of people, and supports the livelihoods especially of those living in rural areas. Working, sustainably managed forests are good for the environment, providing clean air, clean water, wildlife habitat and carbon storage.
 
The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the use of the addressee. The contents may not be disclosed, copied or distributed, without the consent of PEFC Council. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender by return email that you have received it in error, and delete the message immediately.
 
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the organisation.

 
While PEFC council makes every effort to ensure that this message is virus free, by virus checking all outgoing emails, it cannot guarantee that this is the case and cannot accept any responsibility for damage caused by a virus or alteration by a third party during transmission over public networks, which may not be 100 percent secure.

 

 

This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. www.websense.com

FW: New publication on Role of AFOLU actions in INDCs in Asia

 

Dear Climate-L community,

 

On behalf of the LEDS Global Partnership AFOLU Working Group, we are pleased to announce the publication of a new report, “Role of Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use Mitigation in INDCs and National Policy in Asia”. 

 

Abstract:

The 21st United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Conference (COP 21) that took place in Paris in December 2015 resulted in a historic agreement. 195 nations agreed to combat climate change and introduce actions and investment towards a low carbon, resilient and sustainable future. The Paris Agreement was built upon the submission of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) by individual countries, in which nations describe the actions they intend to undertake to lower emissions. Yet analysis of the 188 country submissions to date indicates that current contributions may not be enough to stay below 2° Celsius warming, putting pressure on all countries to consider how they can increase their level of ambition.

 

To assist national policy makers and other decision-makers understand and strengthen the connection between the current role Agriculture, Forestry, and Other Land Use (AFOLU) Low Emission Development Strategies (LEDS) plays in relation to the mitigation from AFOLU, this paper analyzes the strategies proposed in INDCs as well as the national development plans and strategies of selected countries in Asia representing different AFOLU emission profiles and development priorities: Bangladesh, Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Thailand and Vietnam.

 

Main Authors:

·         Alemayehu Zeleke, Winrock International

·         Thuy Phung, USAID Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (LEAF) Program

·         Natcha Tulyasuwan, Engility/ USAID Low Emissions Asia Development (LEAD) Program

·         Robert O'Sullivan, Winrock International

·         Steven Lawry, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

With contributions from:

·         Sophia Gnych, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)

 

For more products, publications, and information from the AFOLU LEDS Global Partnership please visit http://ledsgp.org/working-groups/agriculture-forestry-and-land-use/?loclang=en_gb

 

Thank you!

 

Lara T. Murray, Carbon Analyst, Ecosystem Services Unit

office + 1.703.302.6509 | fax +1.703.302.6512 | lmurray@winrock.org | Skype: laramurray86

2121 Crystal Drive, Suite 500 | Arlington, VA 22202, USA |www.winrock.org

 

 

 

The information in this message, including any attachments, is the property of Winrock International (discloser), is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity to which this message is addressed, and may contain confidential or privileged information. Therefore, the use or disclosure by a person who is not an intended recipient is prohibited. Use or distribution by the intended recipient is permitted if distribution is pursuant to an agreement with discloser authorizing distribution, or distribution is to those that have been previously approved by the discloser for sharing. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, please notify the sender and immediately delete this message.

READ MORE RECENT NEWS AND OPINIONS

WASH news Africa

News from Friends of the Earth

IUCN - News

Institute of Development Studies News

Human Nature - Conservation International Blog

Energia: News

Traditional Knowledge Bulletin

Water Conserve: Water Conservation RSS News Feed

Water Supply and Sanitation News

FAO/Forestry/headlines

InforMEA

Sustainable Development Policy & Practice - Daily RSS Feed

IISD - Latest Additions

IISD Linkages

Climate Change Headlines

DESERTIFICATION

Human Nature - Conservation International Blog